<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>iso8601 &amp;mdash; Doctacosa</title>
    <link>https://blog.interordi.com/tag:iso8601</link>
    <description>🪶 I&#39;m a real blog! Maybe? 🤔  Thoughts by Stéphane, often in English, parfois en français!</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 19:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
    <item>
      <title>Date formats - please standardize!</title>
      <link>https://blog.interordi.com/date-formats-please-standardize</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[I’ve been dealing with people and websites from several countries recently, and there’s something that many groups handle differently: date formats. Depending of who or what I’m communicating with, today’s date might be 7/9/2015, 9-7-2015, 2015-07-09, July 9, 2015, or even 7/9/15. It’s complicated and error-prone, especially if you don’t realize how a given person has chosen to write down said date.&#xA;&#xA;As such, can I propose that everyone should use 2015-07-09? It’s simple, obvious, and placing the year first avoids the issue where you don’t know if 07/09/2015 was written in the American format (9th of July) or in the European format (7th of September). Additionally, it keeps a logical progression if you place a time next to it: 2015-07-09 12:34:56 goes from the largest unit (the unit) to the smallest one (seconds). There’s also no excuse at this point not to always write the year using four digits.&#xA;&#xA;As an added bonus, if you name several computer files in this format, they’ll automatically be sorted from oldest to latest, and you can even flip the display order with a click or two. It’s convenient and simpler for everyone!&#xA;&#xA;#date #musings #standards #iso8601&#xA;&#xA;- Doctacosa]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been dealing with people and websites from several countries recently, and there’s something that many groups handle differently: date formats. Depending of who or what I’m communicating with, today’s date might be 7/9/2015, 9-7-2015, 2015-07-09, July 9, 2015, or even 7/9/15. It’s complicated and error-prone, especially if you don’t realize how a given person has chosen to write down said date.</p>

<p>As such, can I propose that everyone should use 2015-07-09? It’s simple, obvious, and placing the year first avoids the issue where you don’t know if 07/09/2015 was written in the American format (9th of July) or in the European format (7th of September). Additionally, it keeps a logical progression if you place a time next to it: 2015-07-09 12:34:56 goes from the largest unit (the unit) to the smallest one (seconds). There’s also no excuse at this point not to always write the year using four digits.</p>

<p>As an added bonus, if you name several computer files in this format, they’ll automatically be sorted from oldest to latest, and you can even flip the display order with a click or two. It’s convenient and simpler for everyone!</p>

<p><a href="https://blog.interordi.com/tag:date" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">date</span></a> <a href="https://blog.interordi.com/tag:musings" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">musings</span></a> <a href="https://blog.interordi.com/tag:standards" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">standards</span></a> <a href="https://blog.interordi.com/tag:iso8601" class="hashtag"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">iso8601</span></a></p>

<p><em>– Doctacosa</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://blog.interordi.com/date-formats-please-standardize</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>